The most significant document a researcher will ever write is their thesis. Most students find that writing a thesis is incredibly challenging. They might be good at conducting research, but they don’t seem to be good at turning the research into a thesis.
When writing a thesis, students struggle with a variety of issues. Let’s examine the linguistic factors contributing to students’ struggles with thesis writing.
The main linguistic issues with students’ struggles with thesis writing will be issues with grammar, vocabulary, punctuation, and spelling. Academic writing must adhere to a certain level of quality and norms. The majority of students find it extremely difficult to write so they often search online to ‘write my dissertation for me’.
A student entering his school should first become fluent in the language’s structure. For the same, a significant level of commitment, effort, and patience are required. A piece of writing that is absolutely grammatically correct is understandable to everyone, yet a thesis that is poorly grammatically correct will cause academic disaster.
The goal should be to master a language’s rules and develop the capacity to write in it without making any grammar mistakes.
At the same time, increasing numbers of study programs come under criticism since their students’ graduation projects are of poor quality.
Programs are pushing criteria upward. More difficult standards will be necessary for graduates in the near future. However, what are those three difficult steps that students have to cope up with?
1. Introduction
The lack of sufficient contextual elaboration for students’ research topics is a longstanding issue that we observe. Or, to put it another way, they don’t adequately explain how their research fits into the body of prior research (and the real world).
The contextual considerations should be stated in the introduction. To help your reader get started, it is ideal to provide details about the what, where, who, and when type variables.
This background information will provide your reader a better understanding of the context for your research, which will support your justification (more on that coming soon).
Although it may be tempting to skip over this information, it’s crucial to keep in mind that you need to create the scene because the reader probably isn’t familiar with your viewpoint. Always consider your reader to be an intellectually interested layperson who is not an authority in your industry.
Don’t assume what your reader already knows; instead, begin at the beginning and lay a solid contextual basis.
2. Literature review
Finding pertinent research, reading and processing the key findings, summarizing across articles, and drawing conclusions about the body of evidence as a whole are all parts of the regular evaluation of the literature that researchers conduct.
However, there is a fundamental distinction between using narrative summaries that are brief and focused on a few research and aiming to accurately and thoroughly summarize an evidence base to support policy and practice decisions.
In spite of the rising popularity of systematic reviews, publications today across disciplines still use the old methods of reviewing the literature. These evaluations, some of which are mistakenly referred to as “systematic” reviews, may be biased and could lead to inaccurate findings.
This is especially troubling when studies focus on important issues that affect policy and practice, like the current COVID-19 pandemic or climate change.
With a few essential techniques, some of which are not excessively expensive in terms of talent, time, or resources, these drawbacks of standard literature review processes could be significantly overcome.
3. Methodology
It can be very challenging to write the methods portion of a lengthy academic paper. Immediate, gut-level knowledge of what they want to learn and how they plan to do it is common among researchers. It can be difficult to define this in the technical jargon of what can sometimes seem like a highly esoteric area of study.
Also noteworthy is the fact that social scientific methodology has grown into a distinct discipline. You still need to understand its concepts and arguments, regardless of how far away from your actual focus area and how unrelated to your hobbies and skills they may be.
The connections between different components of the methodology are sometimes ambiguous and unclear. The approach has three components, such as qualitative, survey-based, and phenomenological, for a qualitative survey-based phenomenological inquiry, for instance. Consider the relationship between these in order of generality, starting with the most general.
As it describes the extremely broad nature of the data you’re trying to collect (verbal/descriptive – qualitative; numerical – quantitative), qualitative is the most general.
Some writers collect buzzwords and specialized terminology, which they then liberally sprinkle throughout their sentences. The terminologies, however, are used imprecisely and inconsistently despite having very clear definitions in the discourse in which they are used, leading to ambiguity on what they themselves intend by the phrase.
In order to communicate effectively, technical language is definitely necessary. But when you use it, be certain that you are clear on your meaning and that it is maintained throughout. In addition, use clearer, more approachable language whenever possible.
Given that the key concerns are clarity, absence of ambiguity, and detail, there is sure to be some of this in academic writing for the social sciences. When in doubt, it’s better to include something that sounds tedious than to omit anything and risk sounding ambiguous or vague.
Even if tedium isn’t ideal, it won’t have as much of an impact on the quality of your thoughts as obscurity will.
However, if you’ve previously stated it, you generally don’t need to repeat it again. You can assume that your reader is aware of what a survey or interview is (although you might need to be explicit about the advantages of each), and that quantitative approaches aim to get numerical data.
Reading some examples from our department or school will help us understand what is expected and what we should include. Dissertation help from your supervisor would be convincing.
From discipline to discipline and college to college, there are varying levels of structure flexibility. However, carefully examining the suggested structure can help you understand what is required of you and how you are expected to do it.
The bottom line.
We’ve discussed typical errors that students make in their dissertation or thesis introduction chapters. Naturally, this isn’t a complete list, but it’s a good place to start if you want to stay well clear of the usual mistakes.
References
Yu. 2022. (Giving genre-based peer feedback in academic writing: sources of knowledge and skills, difficulties and challenges) Online available at < https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02602938.2020.1742872> Accessed on [18 Mar 2020].
Baw. 2022. (How Academic Help Providers Save The Students’ Future) Online available at https://bestassignmentwriter.co.uk/blog/how-academic-help-providers-save-the-students-future/ Accessed on [April 15, 2022]
